A Hypothesis on the nature of God

The problem lies not with the belief or non belief in god but the very definition of god or the way the concept of god is perceived. The definition of god should be scientific and that would put to rest the debate over theism . God should be perceived ,seen and defined as the collective universal consciousness that decides the course of our universe every passing moment. We are all like plants sprung into existence from the broken branches of the parent plant, we are one but we are unique and different. God is that universal consciousness including the natural laws and the collective consciousness of all sentinal beings which gives birth to the next moment of existence.

Of course this definition is a hypothesis and needs to be proven ,but to a great extent we know that the environment ,the people ,the society and its culture all of these have an effect on how the next moment materialises. Based on this hypothesis the concept of a monotheist god in such a universe of diversity is also not correct, probably this monotheist god concept would hold good in a fully globalised world some time in the future. Also talking of consciousness the most important in all is one's own consciousness, which needs to learn the art of harmonious existence.

Also the moment to be lived is not the past which is a memory and not the future which is a projection of would happen but that moment is now. This is the most important truth we should never forget how ever much we contemplate and philosophize existence.